What Clients Say
Experiences from Those Who Have Worked with Us
We let the outcomes speak. These accounts come from businesses and individuals who brought their matters to Ordelis and found the process worthwhile.
← Back to HomeClient Feedback
Reflections from Our Clients
These accounts represent a range of matters and client types across our three practice areas.
Ahmad Hakimi
Corporate Treasurer, Ipoh
"We engaged Ordelis to review a facility agreement before signing. The team picked up several clauses that were not standard and explained why they might create issues down the line. The advisory was thorough and clearly written — not something we had to decode ourselves."
Banking & Finance Law · March 2026
Lim Mei Xin
Operations Manager, Butterworth
"We had a DOE inspection coming and weren't entirely certain our documentation was in order. Ordelis went through our records and identified the gaps. The process was organised and their communication was straightforward. We came through the inspection without significant findings."
Environmental Compliance · February 2026
Rajan Subramaniam
Small Business Owner, Taiping
"My terms and conditions were copied from somewhere online years ago and I had never properly reviewed them. Ordelis looked them over against the Consumer Protection Act and flagged several areas that needed updating. The revised version gave me much more confidence."
Consumer Protection Advisory · March 2026
Nurul Kamilah
Finance Director, Perak
"Ordelis advised us on a security arrangement that our bank had structured somewhat unusually. Rather than simply accepting the bank's framing, they walked through the implications with us. We negotiated two changes as a result that improved our position. Worth the engagement fee."
Banking & Finance Law · January 2026
Tan Wei Jian
Plantation Manager, Perak
"We were developing a new site and had some uncertainty about the EIA requirements for our scale of operation. The regulatory mapping Ordelis provided saved us a considerable amount of guesswork. They were honest about what needed to be done and what didn't."
Environmental Compliance · February 2026
Siti Norain
Consumer, Ipoh
"I was in a dispute with a retailer over a defective product they refused to replace. I wasn't sure what my rights actually were. After one session with Ordelis, I understood my position clearly and what steps were available to me. I felt much less uncertain going into the next conversation with the retailer."
Consumer Protection Advisory · March 2026
Krishnamoorthy Raj
Managing Director, Chemor
"Our manufacturing operation had some gaps in its environmental documentation that had accumulated over time. Ordelis helped us map what was required, reviewed what we had, and gave practical guidance on what to address first. The timeline they gave us was accurate."
Environmental Compliance · January 2026
Yong Pei Ling
E-commerce Business Owner, Kampar
"I run an online shop and realised I had no real complaint-handling procedure. Ordelis drafted one for me and revised my terms at the same time. They explained the e-commerce requirements under Malaysian law, which I hadn't fully looked at before. Engagement was short but very useful."
Consumer Protection Advisory · February 2026
Fadzillah Azman
Legal Affairs Officer, Ipoh
"We referred a corporate borrower client to Ordelis for advice on a complex syndicated facility. The advisory they produced was well-structured and gave the client a clear picture of their position. We'll be referring more clients with banking matters their way."
Banking & Finance Law · March 2026
Detailed Accounts
Selected Matter Summaries
A closer look at how specific engagements unfolded and what clients found useful about the process.
Banking & Finance Law · Ipoh, Perak
Reviewing a Corporate Loan Facility Before Signing
The Situation
A manufacturing company in Perak was about to finalise a term loan facility with a financial institution. Their in-house team had reviewed the documentation but was uncertain about several clauses, particularly around the financial covenants and cross-default provisions. They wanted an independent perspective before committing.
What Ordelis Did
We reviewed the full facility agreement and security documents, cross-referencing against BNM guidelines and standard market practice. We prepared a written advisory note identifying three clauses that warranted renegotiation, including a cross-default trigger that was broader than is typical for this type of facility.
The Outcome
The client was able to approach their bank with specific, reasoned amendments. Two of the three requests were accepted. The engagement took eleven working days from initial briefing to delivery of the advisory note. The client described the process as clear and without unnecessary complication.
"We knew something wasn't quite right but couldn't articulate it precisely. Ordelis put it into words for us and gave us the footing to push back." — Finance Director, Perak
Environmental Compliance · Chemor, Perak
Preparing a Manufacturing Operation for a DOE Compliance Review
The Situation
A mid-sized manufacturing firm had expanded its operations incrementally over several years without updating its DOE documentation accordingly. When notified of an upcoming scheduled review, management recognised that the current documentation no longer fully reflected actual operations. They had about six weeks before the inspection.
What Ordelis Did
We carried out a regulatory mapping exercise to identify which DOE licences and conditions applied to the expanded operations. Working through the existing documentation, we identified gaps and produced a prioritised list of corrective measures. We also reviewed the firm's scheduled waste management records, which had not been maintained consistently.
The Outcome
The firm addressed the priority gaps within the available timeframe. The DOE review proceeded without the issuance of any formal notice. The engagement covered approximately five and a half weeks in total. The firm has since maintained a more structured approach to its environmental documentation.
"Having someone go through the documentation systematically and tell us what actually needed fixing — rather than what theoretically might need fixing — was what made the difference." — Operations Manager, Chemor
Consumer Protection Advisory · Kampar, Perak
Bringing an E-Commerce Business into Regulatory Alignment
The Situation
An online retailer had been operating for three years and had accumulated a number of customer complaints that, while resolved informally, pointed to gaps in their policies. They were also aware that regulations covering e-commerce had developed and were unsure whether their current terms met current requirements under the Consumer Protection Act 1999.
What Ordelis Did
We reviewed the existing terms and conditions, return policy, and complaint-handling approach against the relevant provisions of the CPA 1999 and related regulations. We drafted revised versions of the key documents and produced a brief internal procedure for handling complaints in a way that met statutory expectations.
The Outcome
The business implemented the revised documents and procedure within two weeks. The engagement ran for just under three weeks. The client noted that the new complaint-handling approach had reduced the time spent on customer disputes considerably, as expectations were now set out more clearly at the point of purchase.
"I wasn't expecting the engagement to be as practical as it was. I came away with documents I could actually use, not just a report telling me what I should do." — E-commerce Business Owner, Kampar
By the Numbers
A Steady Track Record
12+
Years of practice in Malaysian legal matters
340+
Clients assisted across all practice areas
4.8
Average satisfaction rating from client follow-ups
94%
Of engagements completed within stated timelines
Malaysian Bar Membership
All advocates and solicitors at Ordelis are members in good standing with the Malaysian Bar.
Perak Legal Community Member
Active participant in the Bar Committee of Perak, contributing to regional legal practice standards.
PDPA Compliant Practice
Client data handling fully aligned with the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 requirements.
Continuing Professional Development
Legal team attends regular CPD programmes required under Malaysian Bar regulations.
Professional Indemnity Cover
Ordelis maintains professional indemnity insurance as required by Bar regulations.
Serving Ipoh Since 2013
Established presence in Perak's legal community, with deep familiarity with regional regulatory practice.
Reach Us
Contact Details
We are based in Ipoh and serve clients across Perak and beyond.
Phone
+60 5-5472 8316Address
41 Persiaran Greentown
30450 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
Office Hours
Mon–Fri: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM
Sat: 9:00 AM – 1:00 PM
Sun: Closed
Begin a Conversation
Your matter deserves a considered look
Whether you have an existing matter or are looking to understand your position before something becomes an issue, we are glad to talk through what's on your mind.